Skip to main content

Section 3.1 Equations and their Solutions

Definition 3.1.1.

An algebraic equation is two algebraic expression separated by an equals sign.
Recall that we may think of an algebraic expression as a symbolic representation of some sequence of operations performed on the variable(s). Thus, an algebraic equation indicates that two different processes carried out on the same variable(s) result in the same output. Clearly, different processes typically lead to different results, so solutions (values of the variable for which both processes yield the same result) to equations are interesting. In our study of algebra, the most fruitful way of thinking of an equation is as a question.

Subsection 3.1.1 Algebraic Equations as Questions

Example 3.1.3.

Consider the equation
\begin{equation*} x^2 = x+x. \end{equation*}
Find as many solutions as you can, and at least one non-solution.
Solution.
\(x\)\(x\)\(x\)\(x=2\)\(x=0\)\(x=2\)
\begin{equation*} 2^2 = 2+2, \end{equation*}
\(4=4\)\(x=0\)
\begin{equation*} 0^2 = 0+0, \end{equation*}
\(x=3\)
\begin{equation*} 3^2 = 3+3. \end{equation*}
\(9\neq 6\text{,}\)\(x=3\)
Since there are infinitely many numbers to check, and equations may be complicated, it would be impossible to proceed by just guessing and checking to find solutions. Thus we want a (sort of) systematic approach to solving equations. We also see from the example above that equations may have multiple solutions, so we also want to know if we have found all of the solutions. Usually this gets answered on a case by case basis. We will look at some important examples in this chapter.

Question 3.1.4.

  1. Find an equation with \(x=1\) and \(x=-1\) as its only solutions. Hint: What is a procedure you can do to \(x=1\) and \(x=-1\) and get the same result?
  2. For any number \(a\text{,}\) can you find an equation with \(x=a\) and \(x=-a\) as its only solutions?

Subsection 3.1.2 Basic Solving

For now, we will consider equations that only involve one variable. Our goal is to find all values of the variable that make the equation true. We ultimately want to get a statement that looks like
\begin{equation*} x=\text{some number}. \end{equation*}
Let’s consider a relatively easy example.

Example 3.1.5.

Solve the equation
\begin{equation*} \sqrt{2x+9} = 5. \end{equation*}
Solution.
\(x\)\(\sqrt{2x+9}\)
S1:
Multiply \(x\) by \(2\text{.}\)
S2:
add \(9\) to S1.
S3:
take the square root of S2.
We can solve the equation by systematically undoing each of these steps, starting with S3. So we do the following:
Undo S3:
square both sides to get
\begin{equation*} 2x+9 = 25. \end{equation*}
Undo S2:
subtract \(9\) to get
\begin{equation*} 2x = 16. \end{equation*}
Undo S1:
divide by \(2\) to get
\begin{equation*} x=8. \end{equation*}
(Now you should substitute \(x=8\) into the original equation to check that it is a solution.)
This process of solving by undoing operations in order might be called the "shoes and socks" method. You can think of each step in the algebraic expression on the left-hand side of the equation as an article of clothing, like shoes and socks. You can remove them (undo the operation), but you have to do it in reverse order (first remove the shoes, then the socks).
Notice that after each step in solving an equation you are left with another equation. We hope that the new equation will be easier to solve after each step. The critical thing is that each new equation must be equivalent to the previous one in the sense that it has the same solutions. The manipulations that one can do to equations that result in equivalent equations are as follows:
  • Replace an algebraic expression with an equivalent algebraic expression. This usually takes the form of simplifying the expression one side of the equation in order to make solving easier.
  • Apply an operation to both sides of the equation. This is what you do when you
Often, when we apply the same operation to both sides of an equation, this takes the form of β€œmoving from one side to the other”. What is really happening is undoing an operation on one side and applying the same inverse operation on the other.
To eliminate confusion, each time we write down an equivalent equation from a given equation, we will use the symbol \(\longleftrightarrow\) or \(\updownarrow\) to separate them. Interpret this symbol as meaning β€œthis equation is true exactly when that equation is true”.

Checkpoint 3.1.6.

Checkpoint 3.1.7.

Checkpoint 3.1.8.

Question 3.1.9.

Write down in words exactly was done at each step in the following process to solve \(\frac{10}{x+5} = 5.\)
\begin{align*} \frac{10}{x+5} = \amp\ 5 \\ \updownarrow \amp \\ \frac{1}{x+5} = \amp\ \frac{1}{2} \\ \updownarrow \amp \\ x+5 = \amp\ 2 \\ \updownarrow \amp \\ x = \amp\ -3. \end{align*}

Example 3.1.10.

We wish to solve the equation
\begin{equation*} \frac{6x+1}{x-5} = 2. \end{equation*}
Solution.
β€œclear the denominator”
\begin{align*} \frac{6x+1}{x-5} = \amp\ 2\\ \updownarrow \amp (\text{multiply both sides by } x-5)\\ 6x+1 = \amp\ 2(x-5)\\ \updownarrow \amp (\text{distribute})\\ 6x+1 = \amp\ 2x-10 \\ \updownarrow \amp (\text{move (subtract) the } 2x)\\ 4x+1 = \amp\ -10. \end{align*}
S1:
Multiply \(x\) by \(4.\)
S2:
Add \(1\) to S1.
\(-10\text{.}\)
\begin{align*} 4x+1 = \amp\ -10\\ \updownarrow \amp (\text{undo S2 by subtracting } 1)\\ 4x = \amp\ -11\\ \updownarrow \amp (\text{undo S1 by dividing by } 4)\\ x = \amp\ \frac{-11}{4} \end{align*}
\begin{align*} \frac{6\cdot\frac{-11}{4}+1}{\frac{-11}{4}-5} = \amp\ \frac{\frac{-33}{2}+1}{\frac{-31}{4}}\\ = \amp\ \frac{\frac{-31}{2}}{\frac{-31}{4}} \\ = \amp\ \frac{-31}{2}\cdot\frac{4}{-31} \\ = \amp\ 2\ \checkmark\text{.} \end{align*}
\(x = \frac{-11}{4} \)is
Clearly, solving equations can be rather complicated. However, a good basic approach to solving equations is the following: A good exercise right now is to look back at 3.1.5, 3.1.9, and 3.1.10 to see how this process was carried out in each case.
It would be impossible to write down an example of every solution method for every equation. In fact, there are many equations cannot be solved by any algebraic methods. However, if you just apply the manipulations given above to get equivalent equations, you can solve many of the equations you might encounter. Becoming proficient will require plenty of thoughtful practice.

Question 3.1.12.

Solve the following equations for the indicated variable. It’s a good idea to do this very carefully and writing down where you are in the solving process outlined in 3.1.11 as you work through each one.
  1. \((3x-7)^3 = 8\text{.}\) Solve for \(x\text{.}\)
  2. \(7+2x = 2+3(x+1)\text{.}\) Solve for \(x\text{.}\)
  3. \(1-(x-7) = 2x+4\text{.}\) Solve for \(x\text{.}\)
  4. \(4(t-1)^2 = 16\text{.}\) Solve for \(t\text{.}\)
  5. \(\frac{2p-1}{3-4p} = 8\text{.}\) Solve for \(p\text{.}\)
  6. \(\frac{1}{x} + \frac{2}{x+1} = 0\text{.}\) Solve for \(x\text{.}\)
  7. \(\frac{1}{2x+7} = \frac{3}{x-1}\text{.}\) Solve for \(x\text{.}\)
  8. \(|2x-1| = 5\text{.}\) Solve for \(x\text{.}\) Hint: This is really two equations; if the absolute value is \(5\text{,}\) then the value could be positive or negative \(5\text{.}\)

Subsection 3.1.3 Solutions from Factoring

In Chapter 1 we observed that \(0a=0\) for any real number \(a\text{.}\) In this section (and frequently from now on) we will use the following important fact:
This is a very powerful fact for solving equations. Using this, if we can break a complicated expression into a product of simpler expressions, then the complicated expression is zero only if one of the simpler expressions is zero. This is the main reason we factor algebraic expressions.

Example 3.1.14.

Earlier we solved the equation
\begin{equation*} x^2 = 2x \end{equation*}
by inspection. Now we can solve it by factoring. Our first step is to put this equation in the form
\begin{equation*} \text{some algebraic expression that can be factored}=0 \end{equation*}
so that we may apply the Zero Factors Theorem after factoring the expression on the left-hand side. We do this by subtracting the \(2x\) over to the left-hand side, then proceeding as follows:
\begin{align*} x^2 = \amp \ 2x \\ \updownarrow \amp (\text{subtract})\\ x^2-2x = \amp\ 0 \\ \updownarrow \amp (\mbox{factor}) \\ x(x-2) = \amp\ 0. \end{align*}
Now we use the Zero Factors Theorem; either \(x=0\) or \(x-2 = 0\text{.}\) Hence our solutions are \(x=0\) and \(x=2\text{.}\)

Checkpoint 3.1.16.

Sometimes it is not obvious that factoring will be helpful to solve an equation. However, after a little manipulation we see that many equations can be solved using factoring as the critical step.

Example 3.1.17.

Solve
\begin{equation*} \frac{2}{x} - \frac{2}{x-3} = 3. \end{equation*}
Solution.
\begin{align*} \frac{2}{x} - \frac{2}{x-3} = \amp\ 3\\ \updownarrow \amp (\text{combine fractions on left})\\ \frac{2(x-3)-2x}{x(x-3)} = \amp\ 3 \\ \updownarrow \amp (\text{simplify numerator on left})\\ \frac{-6}{x(x-3)} = \amp\ 3 \\ \updownarrow \amp (\text{clear the denominator}) \\ -6 = \amp \ 3x(x-3) \\ \updownarrow \amp (\text{distribute and rearrange the equation})\\ 3x^2-9x + 6 = \amp\ 0 \\ \updownarrow \amp (\text{factor})\\ 3(x-1)(x-2) = \amp\ 0. \end{align*}
\(x=1\)\(x=2\text{.}\)

Question 3.1.18.