Consider the scenario where instead of "recovered", we call the stock described by \(R\) "removed" in the sense that they are removed from the \(S\) and \(I\) populations. Suppose that we have a population of \(1000\) individuals, \(I(0) = 2\text{,}\) \(S(0) = 988\text{,}\) and \(R(0) = 10\text{.}\) Let \(a=0.002\) and \(k = 0.5\text{.}\)
Now, assume further that individuals in the removed population can convince individuals in the susceptible population to practice better hygiene to avoid infection. Essentially, susceptible individuals can be "infected" with better health practices. Create a new model with a new variable \(m\) that describes this interaction in a way similar to the \(S\)-\(I\) interaction.
How large does \(m\) need to be to ensure the infected population never goes above \(25\%\) of the population?
What are real-world things that would impact the size of \(m\text{?}\)